Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fuse: invalidate the correct range after O_APPEND direct write
fuse_direct_write_iter() captures pos before generic_write_checks(),
which moves ki_pos to EOF for O_APPEND writes:
fuse_direct_write_iter()
{
pos = iocb->ki_pos; /* 0 (user-supplied) */
generic_write_checks(); /* ki_pos -> EOF */
fuse_direct_io(); /* writes at EOF, correct */
invalidate(pos, pos + res); /* [0, res) -- wrong */
}
The post-write invalidation targets a stale range instead of the
actual written range at EOF.
This can cause data inconsistency when the file size is not
page-aligned. The tail page straddling EOF has a valid portion
before EOF that concurrent readers can fault back in during the
DIO write window:
Tail page (file size X not page-aligned):
page_start X (EOF) page_end
|--- valid data ----|-- stale --|
CPU0 (O_APPEND DIO writer) CPU1 (buffered reader)
-------------------------- ----------------------
invalidate [X, X+len)
tail page evicted
FUSE_WRITE in flight ...
read [page_start, X)
tail page re-faulted
[X, page_end) = stale
FUSE_WRITE completes
i_size = X + len
invalidate [0, len) <- WRONG
tail page still cached
read [X, X+len)
hits stale tail page
returns old data
Fix by reading pos back from iocb->ki_pos after generic_write_checks(),
as generic_file_direct_write() does.
Also fix a typo in the comment ("may have" -> "may have competed").
fuse: invalidate the correct range after O_APPEND direct write
fuse_direct_write_iter() captures pos before generic_write_checks(),
which moves ki_pos to EOF for O_APPEND writes:
fuse_direct_write_iter()
{
pos = iocb->ki_pos; /* 0 (user-supplied) */
generic_write_checks(); /* ki_pos -> EOF */
fuse_direct_io(); /* writes at EOF, correct */
invalidate(pos, pos + res); /* [0, res) -- wrong */
}
The post-write invalidation targets a stale range instead of the
actual written range at EOF.
This can cause data inconsistency when the file size is not
page-aligned. The tail page straddling EOF has a valid portion
before EOF that concurrent readers can fault back in during the
DIO write window:
Tail page (file size X not page-aligned):
page_start X (EOF) page_end
|--- valid data ----|-- stale --|
CPU0 (O_APPEND DIO writer) CPU1 (buffered reader)
-------------------------- ----------------------
invalidate [X, X+len)
tail page evicted
FUSE_WRITE in flight ...
read [page_start, X)
tail page re-faulted
[X, page_end) = stale
FUSE_WRITE completes
i_size = X + len
invalidate [0, len) <- WRONG
tail page still cached
read [X, X+len)
hits stale tail page
returns old data
Fix by reading pos back from iocb->ki_pos after generic_write_checks(),
as generic_file_direct_write() does.
Also fix a typo in the comment ("may have" -> "may have competed").
Published:
2026-09-17
Score:
n/a
EPSS:
n/a
KEV:
No
Impact:
n/a
Action:
n/a
Analysis and contextual insights are available on OpenCVE Cloud.
Remediation
No vendor fix or workaround currently provided.
Additional remediation guidance may be available on OpenCVE Cloud.
Tracking
Sign in to view the affected projects.
Advisories
No advisories yet.
References
History
Thu, 17 Sep 2026 16:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fuse: invalidate the correct range after O_APPEND direct write fuse_direct_write_iter() captures pos before generic_write_checks(), which moves ki_pos to EOF for O_APPEND writes: fuse_direct_write_iter() { pos = iocb->ki_pos; /* 0 (user-supplied) */ generic_write_checks(); /* ki_pos -> EOF */ fuse_direct_io(); /* writes at EOF, correct */ invalidate(pos, pos + res); /* [0, res) -- wrong */ } The post-write invalidation targets a stale range instead of the actual written range at EOF. This can cause data inconsistency when the file size is not page-aligned. The tail page straddling EOF has a valid portion before EOF that concurrent readers can fault back in during the DIO write window: Tail page (file size X not page-aligned): page_start X (EOF) page_end |--- valid data ----|-- stale --| CPU0 (O_APPEND DIO writer) CPU1 (buffered reader) -------------------------- ---------------------- invalidate [X, X+len) tail page evicted FUSE_WRITE in flight ... read [page_start, X) tail page re-faulted [X, page_end) = stale FUSE_WRITE completes i_size = X + len invalidate [0, len) <- WRONG tail page still cached read [X, X+len) hits stale tail page returns old data Fix by reading pos back from iocb->ki_pos after generic_write_checks(), as generic_file_direct_write() does. Also fix a typo in the comment ("may have" -> "may have competed"). | |
| Title | fuse: invalidate the correct range after O_APPEND direct write | |
| First Time appeared |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | |
| Vendors & Products |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| References |
|
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: Linux
Published:
Updated: 2026-09-17T16:06:08.870Z
Reserved: 2026-09-11T19:38:34.786Z
Link: CVE-2026-90096
No data.
Status : Received
Published: 2026-09-17T17:17:01.233
Modified: 2026-09-17T17:17:01.233
Link: CVE-2026-90096
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
No data.
Weaknesses
No weakness.
