Export limit exceeded: 415110 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (415110 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-41378 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| The SSID field is not parsed correctly and can be used to inject commands into the hostpad.conf file. This can be exploited by an attacker to extend his knowledge of the system and compromise other devices. The information is filtered by the logs function of the web panel. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41366 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| In IDF v0.10.0-0C03-03 and ZLF v0.10.0-0C03-04, a configuration error has been detected in cross-origin resource sharing (CORS). Exploiting this vulnerability requires authenticating to the device and executing certain commands that can only be executed with permissions higher than the view permission. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41365 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Code injection vulnerability in IDF v0.10.0-0C03-03 and ZLF v0.10.0-0C03-04. This vulnerability allows an attacker to store malicious payload in software that will run in the victim's browser. Exploiting this vulnerability requires authenticating to the device and executing certain commands that can be executed only with permissions higher than the view permission. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41361 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in IDF v0.10.0-0C03-03 and ZLF v0.10.0-0C03-04. The devices improperly handle TLS requests associated with PROCOME sockets, so TLS requests sent to those PROCOME ports could cause the device to reboot and result in a denial of service. To exploit this vulnerability, PROCOME ports must be configured and active, with communications encryption active. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41360 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in IDF v0.10.0-0C03-03 and ZLF v0.10.0-0C03-04. The device is vulnerable to a packet flooding denial of service attack. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69025 | 3 Aethonic, Woocommerce, Wordpress | 3 Poptics, Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in Aethonic Poptics poptics allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects Poptics: from n/a through <= 1.0.20. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41362 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Code injection vulnerability in IDF v0.10.0-0C03-03 and ZLF v0.10.0-0C03-04. This vulnerability allows an attacker to store malicious payload in software that will run in the victim's browser. Exploiting this vulnerability requires authenticating to the device and executing certain commands that can be executed with view permission. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41254 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| STOMP over WebSocket applications may be vulnerable to a security bypass that allows an attacker to send unauthorized messages. Affected Spring Products and VersionsSpring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.11 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.23 * 6.0.x - 6.0.29 * 5.3.0 - 5.3.45 * Older, unsupported versions are also affected. MitigationUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix versionAvailability6.2.x6.2.12OSS6.1.x6.1.24 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 6.0.xN/A Out of support https://spring.io/projects/spring-framework#support 5.3.x5.3.46 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. CreditThis vulnerability was discovered and responsibly reported by Jannis Kaiser. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41249 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| The Spring Framework annotation detection mechanism may not correctly resolve annotations on methods within type hierarchies with a parameterized super type with unbounded generics. This can be an issue if such annotations are used for authorization decisions. Your application may be affected by this if you are using Spring Security's @EnableMethodSecurity feature. You are not affected by this if you are not using @EnableMethodSecurity or if you do not use security annotations on methods in generic superclasses or generic interfaces. This CVE is published in conjunction with CVE-2025-41248 https://spring.io/security/cve-2025-41248 . | ||||
| CVE-2025-41246 | 2 Microsoft, Vmware | 2 Windows, Tools | 2026-04-15 | 7.6 High |
| VMware Tools for Windows contains an improper authorisation vulnerability due to the way it handles user access controls. A malicious actor with non-administrative privileges on a guest VM, who is already authenticated through vCenter or ESX may exploit this issue to access other guest VMs. Successful exploitation requires knowledge of credentials of the targeted VMs and vCenter or ESX. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41237 | 1 Vmware | 3 Esxi, Fusion, Workstation | 2026-04-15 | 9.3 Critical |
| VMware ESXi, Workstation, and Fusion contain an integer-underflow in VMCI (Virtual Machine Communication Interface) that leads to an out-of-bounds write. A malicious actor with local administrative privileges on a virtual machine may exploit this issue to execute code as the virtual machine's VMX process running on the host. On ESXi, the exploitation is contained within the VMX sandbox whereas, on Workstation and Fusion, this may lead to code execution on the machine where Workstation or Fusion is installed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41235 | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High | ||
| Spring Cloud Gateway Server forwards the X-Forwarded-For and Forwarded headers from untrusted proxies. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41232 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Spring Security Aspects may not correctly locate method security annotations on private methods. This can cause an authorization bypass. Your application may be affected by this if the following are true: * You are using @EnableMethodSecurity(mode=ASPECTJ) and spring-security-aspects, and * You have Spring Security method annotations on a private method In that case, the target method may be able to be invoked without proper authorization. You are not affected if: * You are not using @EnableMethodSecurity(mode=ASPECTJ) or spring-security-aspects, or * You have no Spring Security-annotated private methods | ||||
| CVE-2025-41229 | 1 Vmware | 1 Cloud Foundation | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| VMware Cloud Foundation contains a directory traversal vulnerability. A malicious actor with network access to port 443 on VMware Cloud Foundation may exploit this issue to access certain internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41228 | 1 Vmware | 2 Esxi, Vcenter Server | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| VMware ESXi and vCenter Server contain a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability due to improper input validation. A malicious actor with network access to the login page of certain ESXi host or vCenter Server URL paths may exploit this issue to steal cookies or redirect to malicious websites. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26379 | 1 Johnsoncontrols | 5 Iq Panels2, Iq Panels2+, Iqhub and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Use of a weak pseudo-random number generator, which may allow an attacker to read or inject encrypted PowerG packets. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41225 | 1 Vmware | 1 Vcenter Server | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The vCenter Server contains an authenticated command-execution vulnerability. A malicious actor with privileges to create or modify alarms and run script action may exploit this issue to run arbitrary commands on the vCenter Server. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69019 | 2 Flippingbook, Wordpress | 2 Flippingbook, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in FlippingBook FlippingBook flippingbook allows DOM-Based XSS.This issue affects FlippingBook: from n/a through <= 2.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13425 | 1 Google | 1 Osv-scalibr | 2026-04-15 | 3.3 Low |
| A bug in the filesystem traversal fallback path causes fs/diriterate/diriterate.go:Next() to overindex an empty slice when ReadDir returns nil for an empty directory, resulting in a panic (index out of range) and an application crash (denial of service) in OSV-SCALIBR. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41082 | 1 Altitude | 1 Communication Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Illegal HTTP request traffic vulnerability (CL.0) in Altitude Communication Server, caused by inconsistent analysis of multiple HTTP requests over a single Keep-Alive connection using Content-Length headers. This can cause a desynchronization of requests between frontend and backend servers, which could allow request hiding, cache poisoning or security bypass. | ||||