Export limit exceeded: 385722 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (385722 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-61765 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Megatron-bridge | 2026-09-02 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA Megatron Bridge contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause a deserialization of untrusted data. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, data tampering, and information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84351 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-02 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in GPU in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-80047 | 1 Huggingface | 1 Transformers | 2026-09-02 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in Hugging Face Transformers (versions >= 4.49.0 and <= 5.8.1) allows remote Python files to be written to local disk without user consent when using GenerativePreTrainedModel.load_custom_generate(). The function fetches and caches a remote module file before performing the required trust_remote_code consent check, inverting the security model enforced by other code-loading paths (such as AutoConfig, AutoModel, and AutoTokenizer). As a result, attacker‑controlled Python code from custom_generate/generate.py is copied into the user’s ~/.cache/huggingface/modules directory even if the user declines the trust prompt. Although execution is correctly gated, the file write is not reversible and can persist across sessions. This can lead to persistent, unauthorized files on disk and stale cache collisions where cached attacker code may later be executed during trusted model loads. The issue stems from an unconditional file write in dynamic_module_utils.py prior to any trust verification. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83551 | 1 Aws | 1 Sagemaker-python-sdk | 2026-09-02 | 7.2 High |
| Cleartext storage of sensitive information in the @step and @remote decorator pipeline component in Amazon SageMaker Python SDK before v3.11.0 and v2.256.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to extract the HMAC signing key from SageMaker DescribePipeline API responses and forge valid integrity signatures for specially crafted function payloads, achieving code execution in another user's pipeline execution context within the same AWS account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73700 | 2026-09-02 | 9 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against an administrative user of the interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in a victim's browser in the context of the affected interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73745 | 2026-09-02 | 3.1 Low | ||
| A vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to view some information handled by the affected system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain insight into internal services and workflows, increasing the risk of unauthorized access when combined with other vulnerabilities. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61762 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Megatron-bridge | 2026-09-02 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA Megatron Bridge contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause a deserialization of untrusted data. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, data tampering, and information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61761 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Megatron-bridge | 2026-09-02 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA Megatron Bridge contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause a deserialization of untrusted data. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, data tampering, and information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61767 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Megatron-bridge | 2026-09-02 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA Megatron Bridge contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause a deserialization of untrusted data. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, data tampering, and information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78608 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). An authorization control was not applied to an internal Kibana APM integration function, allowing any authenticated Kibana user to read APM server credentials that should be restricted to users holding APM or Fleet administrative privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84442 | 1 Mapquest | 1 Get Directions App | 2026-09-02 | 4.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in MapQuest Get Directions App 10.16.1 on Android. This vulnerability affects the function getDataColumn of the file ExpoShareIntentModule.kt of the component com.mapquest.android.ace. The manipulation leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51683 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the setLanCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to alter LAN network configuration via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51702 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the setIpPortFilterRules function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to alter firewall policies via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51703 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the setWiFiScheduleCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to alter when Wi-Fi is available via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51714 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the setRoamingCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to alter roaming behavior via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51732 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the delWiFiScheduleCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to remove Wi-Fi schedule entries via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51735 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect access control in the showSyslog function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve recent system logs via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51739 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the CloudSrvVersionCheck function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger cloud update checks via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71257 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| Apache Wicket enforces the upload limits configured on a form or upload field while parsing a multipart request with Apache Commons FileUpload. If the request body has already been consumed by another component, Commons FileUpload returns no items and Wicket falls back to reading the upload through HttpServletRequest#getParts(). The per-file size limit (for example Form#setFileMaxSize) and the file count limit (Form#setFileCountMax) are not applied to the parts obtained that way, and no exception is raised, so the upload is processed as though those limits had been satisfied. A remote uploader can therefore submit files that are larger, or more numerous, than the application permits, up to whatever the component that parsed the request allows. A part carrying no Content-Type header is additionally read into memory in full during parsing, so the size of that allocation is determined by the request and bounded only by those same external limits. The total upload size limit (Form#setMaxSize) is not affected. Commons FileUpload compares the declared Content-Length against it before reading the body, so a request declaring an oversized length is rejected before the fallback is reached. The fallback is reached in deployments where a servlet or filter has already parsed the request body — for example a servlet annotated with @MultipartConfig, Spring Boot's multipart resolver, or any filter that calls HttpServletRequest#getParameter() on a multipart request. It applies to the Wicket components that accept uploads on that path, including Form with FileUploadField, FileUploadToResourceField and AjaxFileDropBehavior. Applications that configure neither a per-file nor a file-count limit are not affected, as Wicket applies neither by default. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. As a workaround, configure equivalent limits in the component that parses the request — for example spring.servlet.multipart.max-file-size and max-request-size, or maxFileSize and maxRequestSize in @MultipartConfig or in the web.xml <multipart-config> element. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51742 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the discoverWan function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger WAN discovery logic via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||