Export limit exceeded: 391055 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 391055 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (391055 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-79742 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-11 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an incomplete environment variable blocklist. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79698 | 1 Advantech | 14 Wise-6610, Wise-6610-cb, Wise-6610-eb and 11 more | 2026-09-11 | 9.9 Critical |
| A vulnerability was identified in Advantech WISE-6610-NB, WISE-6610-EB, WISE-6610-TB, WISE-6610-JB, WISE-6610-CB, WISE-6610-EL-NB, WISE-6610-EL-EB, WISE-6610-EL-TB, WISE-6610-EL-JB, WISE-6610-EL-CB, WISE-6610P-DEA, WISE-6610P-DNA and WISE-6610P-DTA 1.2.1_20251110. This vulnerability affects the function nodered_lib_apply of the component Node-RED Library. Such manipulation of the argument act leads to command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. Upgrading to version 1.2.4_20260821 is able to resolve this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79693 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway | 2026-09-11 | 3.4 Low |
| Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains a Least Privilege Violation vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78573 | 1 Ibm | 2 Contextforge-mcp-gateway, Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-09-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.7 could allow a remote attacker to gain administrative access due to the use of default credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77807 | 2 Acyba, Wordpress | 2 Acymailing – An Ultimate Newsletter Plugin And Marketing Automation Solution For Wordpress, Wordpress | 2026-09-11 | 7.5 High |
| The AcyMailing – An Ultimate Newsletter Plugin and Marketing Automation Solution for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in all versions up to, and including, 11.0.4 via the `user[name]` Parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read the contents of arbitrary files on the server, which can contain sensitive information. Exploitation requires "Embed images" option in AcyMailing configuration being enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77108 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2026-09-11 | 7.5 High |
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75711 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75700 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75692 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75670 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75651 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75624 | 1 Ibm | 1 App Connect Enterprise | 2026-09-11 | 8.8 High |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.1, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.27 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to incorrect authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72710 | 1 Spip | 1 Spip | 2026-09-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| SPIP before 4.4.18 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the editer_objet action where the arg parameter resolves SQL table names without enforcing an editable columns allowlist, allowing attackers with a valid nonce to inject attacker-controlled rows into the spip_jobs table. Attackers can supply arg=job/0 with crafted fonction and args values, which are later unserialized and executed when the cron job queue is drained, resulting in arbitrary PHP function execution on the underlying system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71440 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63076 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-09-11 | 7.5 High |
| Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP password based protection verification only checks whether the protectionAlg parameter was not NULL and not its ASN.1 type, before treating it as a PBMParameter. A crafted message can contain a parameter of a different type, which is then dereferenced as an invalid pointer. Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated attacker can crash an application acting as a CMP server that accepts PBM-protected messages, or a CMP client talking to a malicious or intercepted CMP server, resulting in a Denial of Service. CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference Description: When verifying the password-based MAC protection of a CMP message, OpenSSL library reads the protectionAlg algorithm parameter with X509_ALGOR_get0(), which returns both the parameter type and its value pointer. The value is then cast to an ASN1_STRING and treated as the expected PBMParameter after only checking that pointer is not NULL. The parameter type returned by X509_ALGOR_get0() was never consulted. This happens during protection verification, before any MAC is computed, so no knowledge of the PBM shared secret is required; the only precondition is that PBM verification is reachable. On the server side this is reached from OSSL_CMP_SRV_process_request() for any application that stands up a CMP server accepting PBM-protected messages, and on the client side from CMP response validation against a malicious or on-path (MITM) server. The reliable consequence is a denial of service; there is no memory disclosure, no controlled memory write, and no path to code execution. CMP is a specialized feature that an application must explicitly enable. FIPS impact: no As the CMP code lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49838 | 1 Osrg | 1 Gobgp | 2026-09-11 | 5.9 Medium |
| GoBGP is an open source Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) implementation in the Go Programming Language. Prior to version 4.7.0, GoBGP accepts a zero-length AS_PATH during UPDATE decoding and later panics while validating that attribute for a confederation eBGP peer. The vulnerable path is in the BGP UPDATE validator: a malformed UPDATE that should be rejected as a malformed AS_PATH instead reaches an unchecked `p.Value[0]` access, allowing a configured confederation eBGP peer to trigger a denial of service. Version 4.7.0 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48707 | 1 Instantcms | 1 Icms2 | 2026-09-11 | 3.1 Low |
| InstantCMS is a free and open source content management system. Versions prior to 2.18.2 have a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the file upload functionality (`system/core/uploader.php` at lines 509-532). When the "upload from URL" feature follows an HTTP redirect, the redirected target URL bypasses the private IP address blacklist check. This allows authenticated users to scan and access internal network services. Version 2.18.2 contains a fix. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45768 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2026-09-11 | 7.5 High |
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Starting in version 8.0.0 and prior to version 8.0.5, LDAP transaction state could store an unbounded number of responses. Because LDAP can be processed over UDP, crafted traffic may cause Suricata to consume excessive memory, potentially resulting in denial of service. Version 8.0.5 contains a fix. As a workaround, disable LDAP application-layer parsing where it is not required. Alternatively, use a rule like `alert ldap any any -> any any (sid: 1; ldap.responses.count: >1024; bypass;)`. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45762 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2026-09-11 | 7.5 High |
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to versions 7.0.16 and 8.0.5, Suricata's IP defragmentation tracker lookup did not verify that an existing tracker used the same IP address family as the packet being processed. Under crafted fragmented IPv4/IPv6 traffic, an IPv6 fragment could be associated with an IPv4 defragmentation tracker. This can lead to a remote packet-triggered crash and denial of service when Suricata performs the relevant defragmentation. Versions 7.0.16 and 8.0.5 contain a fix. As a workaround, if using Suricata as an IDS with AF_PACKET, enabling AF_PACKET's `defrag` option may prevent Suricata from seeing such fragmented packets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40635 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerscale Onefs | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 9.12.0.0 through 9.13.1.0 contain an Insecure Temporary File vulnerability. A low privileged remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service and information tampering. | ||||