Export limit exceeded: 389946 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 389946 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (389946 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-87519 | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Incorrect authorization in Safebrowsing in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-87493 | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Missing authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-87468 | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Incorrect authorization in Isolated in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-87431 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| Missing authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-87429 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| Missing authorization in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-87107 | 2026-09-10 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Consul and Consul Enterprise are vulnerable to an authorization bypass in the catalog deregistration path that may allow a local ACL token to delete peer-imported catalog objects. A caller with {{service:write}} or {{node:write}} permission may exploit this issue to remove services, checks, or nodes imported from a peered cluster without holding authority over the peer origin. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-87107) is fixed in Consul 2.0.4 and Consul Enterprise 1.21.18, 1.22.12 and 2.0.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86060 | 1 Mikrotik | 1 Routeros | 2026-09-10 | N/A |
| RouterOS contains an argument-handling flaw in the SSH login path involving usernames that begin with a prohibited character, allowing for the trusted RouterOS policy mask to be changed, leading to privilege escalation. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated SSH session to reach the RouterOS login helper.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable) | ||||
| CVE-2026-84432 | 2026-09-10 | N/A | ||
| Concrete CMS 9 through 9.5.2 did not validate an anti-CSRF token in the Boards custom slot dialog controller (concrete/controllers/dialog/board/custom_slot.php) saveTemplate() action. The action created a board_slot_proxy Block and dispatched an AddCustomSlotToBoardCommand against a board instance while gating only on the per-resource canEditBoardContents() permission, so a crafted cross-site request could cause a user holding board-edit permission with an active session to write attacker-chosen slot and template data to a board under their own authority. The state-changing database write completed before any downstream rendering, so the forged request succeeded even when the HTTP response returned a non-200 status. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 5.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Winston Crooker for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67277 | 1 Mikrotik | 1 Routeros | 2026-09-10 | N/A |
| RouterOS accepts a "related" btest connection before the corresponding primary session has completed authentication. An unauthenticated client can use this state to start an IPv4 UDP test. With "random-data=false", the sender transmits an uninitialized tail from a kernel packet buffer. A separate unchecked, inverted packet-size interval causes unsigned integer underflow, anomalously large fragmented output, and can restart the RouterOS kernel. This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable) | ||||
| CVE-2026-28594 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible use after free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28599 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High |
| In addCreatorToken of ActivityManagerService.java, there is a possible Intent Redirection Bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28603 | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High | ||
| In assertSafeToStartCustomActivity of AppRestrictionsFragment.java, there is a possible read/write access to private files due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28617 | 2026-09-10 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| In add of WifiNetworkSuggestionsManager.java, there is a possible persistent DOS due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28624 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible read/write access to files without the proper permissions due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14892 | 1 Tanium | 1 Tanium Server | 2026-09-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Tanium Server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87033 | 1 Tanium | 1 Comply | 2026-09-10 | 5.4 Medium |
| Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87035 | 1 Tanium | 1 Comply | 2026-09-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| Tanium addressed an information disclosure vulnerability in Comply. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87034 | 1 Tanium | 1 Comply | 2026-09-10 | 8.3 High |
| Tanium addressed a SQL injection vulnerability in Comply. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87048 | 1 Tanium | 1 Comply | 2026-09-10 | 5.4 Medium |
| Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87021 | 1 Tanium | 1 Comply | 2026-09-10 | 7.2 High |
| Tanium addressed an unauthorized code execution vulnerability in Comply. | ||||