Export limit exceeded: 403579 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (403579 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-19575 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| The user-mode verification handler for the device_deinit() system call, z_vrfy_device_deinit() in kernel/device.c, validated its dev argument with K_SYSCALL_OBJ_INIT(dev, K_OBJ_ANY). k_object_validate() short-circuits its type comparison when the requested type is K_OBJ_ANY, so the check reduced to "this pointer is the base address of some kernel object the calling thread has been granted" — the object's actual type was never compared, and K_SYSCALL_OBJ_INIT also skips the initialization-state check. The sibling handlers z_vrfy_device_init() and z_vrfy_device_is_ready() already used K_OBJ_DRIVER_ANY and were unaffected. A thread running in user mode can therefore pass any kernel object it holds permission on — most usefully a thread stack object obtained from the k_thread_stack_alloc() syscall or a statically defined K_THREAD_STACK it was granted in order to spawn a child user thread — whose backing memory is writable from user mode. z_impl_device_deinit() then interprets those attacker-written bytes as a struct device: it dereferences the state pointer read out of the object, calls the function pointer read out of ops.deinit, and on success writes through state again. The result is an indirect call to an arbitrary address executed in supervisor mode, plus an arbitrary kernel read and a single-byte kernel write. Exploitation gives a local unprivileged thread full kernel code execution, defeating the CONFIG_USERSPACE isolation boundary entirely; a less precise attempt yields a supervisor-mode fault and a system crash. The defect is only reachable in builds that enable both CONFIG_USERSPACE and CONFIG_DEVICE_DEINIT_SUPPORT — with de-initialization support disabled, z_impl_device_deinit() returns -ENOTSUP without ever dereferencing the pointer. In v4.2.x and v4.3.x, CONFIG_DEVICE_DEINIT_SUPPORT defaulted to y, so every CONFIG_USERSPACE build of those releases is exposed unless the option was explicitly turned off. From v4.4.0 the option is opt-in (no default, and not selected by any in-tree subsystem), so a v4.4.x build is exposed only if it enables the option explicitly. The v4.2 line is no longer maintained and receives no backport. The fix changes the object check to K_OBJ_DRIVER_ANY, which constrains the argument to the build-generated driver object type range (K_OBJ_DRIVER_FIRST..K_OBJ_DRIVER_LAST) — the real struct device instances placed by the linker — so the state and ops.deinit fields are once again kernel-controlled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78022 | 2026-10-09 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1978 | 1 Hitachi | 59 E1090, E1090h, E390 and 56 more | 2026-10-09 | 8.3 High |
| Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Hitachi Storage Navigator and the maintenance console in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, One Block 24, One Block 26, One Block 28. This issue affects Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, One Block 24, One Block 26, One Block 28 : before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-16-xx/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-18-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-07-26-xx/00, SVP Ver. 93-07-26-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. A3-04-02-xx/00, MPC Ver. A3-04-02-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. A3-03-41-xx/00, MPC Ver. A3-03-41-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. A3-03-03-xx/00, MPC Ver. A3-03-03-xx/00. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78249 | 1 Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp. | 69 Apeos 3060 / 2560 / 1860 Japan Model, Apeos 3061 / 2561 / 2061 Japan Model, Apeos 3560 / 3060 / 2560 Asia Pacific Model and 66 more | 2026-10-09 | N/A |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in the web management interface of multiple Multifunction Devices and Printers, including Apeos C4571 1.1.3 and earlier, Apeos C3567 1.1.3, or other products listed, specifically in the handling of externally supplied parameters. If the device receives a specially crafted, malicious request, it may trigger unintended processing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86344 | 1 Redhat | 3 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux, Redhat Directory Server | 2026-10-09 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a complete LDAP operation followed by the first bytes of an incomplete LDAPMessage on the same connection, causing the server to hand that connection to a second worker thread before the first worker's result is flushed. The second worker blocks until nsslapd-ioblocktimeout while holding the connection mutex, preventing delivery of the completed operation's result. Repeating this across a small number of connections proportional to the configured worker-thread pool size exhausts the entire pool under default configuration, denying service to all clients (anonymous and authenticated, plaintext and TLS) for as long as the attacker maintains the connections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86345 | 1 Redhat | 3 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux, Redhat Directory Server | 2026-10-09 | 9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The server does not discard plaintext bytes already buffered from a client connection when negotiating StartTLS, allowing an on-path attacker to inject a crafted LDAP message that is processed after the TLS upgrade and whose response is delivered to the client in place of the client's own pending operation's response, due to messageID collision. This can cause a client application to treat a failed authentication (bind) attempt as successful. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78019 | 2026-10-09 | 7.5 High | ||
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Filesystem access for attacker, and Remote execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78860 | 1 Mercusys | 1 Ac12 V2 | 2026-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| An issue in Mercusys AC12 V2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the storage of information in plaintext | ||||
| CVE-2026-78862 | 1 Mercusys | 1 Ac12 V2 | 2026-10-09 | 6.8 Medium |
| An issue in Mercusys AC12 V2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the UART serial interface on the printed circuit board (PCB) | ||||
| CVE-2026-105301 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On and 1 more | 2026-10-09 | 4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the X.509 client-certificate authenticator of Keycloak, a solution for identity and access management. The issue occurs when the server is configured to check certificate revocation using CRL Distribution Points or OCSP. An attacker can provide a specially crafted certificate that points to a malicious server, causing Keycloak to make unauthorized outbound requests to internal or external endpoints before the certificate is fully validated. This can lead to a blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105326 | 2 Cups, Redhat | 4 Cups, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 1 more | 2026-10-09 | 2.5 Low |
| An argument injection flaw was found in CUPS. When email notification is configured, the CUPS scheduler accepts printer subscription requests that supply a mailto notify-recipient-uri. The mailto notifier passes the recipient address to the configured sendmail program without ensuring it cannot be interpreted as command-line options. A remote attacker who can reach the CUPS service could supply a crafted recipient value starting with "-" to influence sendmail behavior. Successful exploitation depends on the installed mail transfer agent and CUPS network exposure, and may lead to execution of attacker-controlled commands with the privileges of the CUPS service user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41563 | 2 Dawer Drew, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Sitemovr, Sitemovr | 2026-10-09 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Sitemovr <= 1.0.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97300 | 2 Arraytics, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Wp Event Solution, Wp Event Solution | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in WP Event Solution <= 4.1.25 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75962 | 2 Saadiqbal, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Post Smtp, Post Smtp | 2026-10-09 | 7.2 High |
| The Post SMTP – Complete Email Deliverability and SMTP Solution with Email Logs, Alerts, Backup SMTP & Mobile App plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'user_email' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This is exploitable without authentication on WordPress Multisite installations with public registration enabled, as WordPress accepts email addresses containing numeric HTML character references that Post SMTP's stricter validator rejects, persisting the attacker-controlled address verbatim to the email log via the failed-send exception message. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94270 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Deema Payment Gateway | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Deema Payment Gateway WordPress plugin through 1.1.2 does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment provider notifications, and ships with that verification disabled by default, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark an unpaid order as paid, or to cancel or refund an existing order. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94271 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Deema Payment Gateway | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Deema Payment Gateway WordPress plugin through 1.1.2 does not verify the payment with the payment provider when handling the return from the hosted checkout, and does not check the payment status or amount, allowing unauthenticated users to have orders marked as paid without any payment being taken. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94299 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Elegro Crypto Payment | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| The elegro Crypto Payment WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not require a shared secret to be configured before trusting incoming payment notification requests, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge payment confirmations and change the status of arbitrary orders on any installation where that secret has been left at its default empty value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89289 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Fast Courier | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Fast Courier WordPress plugin through 5.2.3 does not restrict an unauthenticated REST route that writes order fulfillment data, allowing unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the courier status and customer-facing tracking details of any WooCommerce order by supplying its id. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94278 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 File Media Renamer | 2026-10-09 | 5.5 Medium |
| The File Media Renamer WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not verify that the requesting user is authorised to modify a given media attachment, allowing any user with file-upload privileges to rename attachments belonging to other users, including administrators, and to corrupt unrelated stored site data that referenced the old file path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86786 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Slider Pro | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Slider Pro WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not perform any capability or authorisation check on one of its AJAX actions, allowing unauthenticated users to retrieve the title, excerpt and permalink of non-public posts, including drafts, pending, scheduled, private and trashed posts, as well as post revisions and media metadata. | ||||