Export limit exceeded: 413957 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (413957 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-99018 | 1 Linux | 2 Linux, Linux Kernel | 2026-10-23 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: riscv: entry: gate shadow call stack reload on sstatus.SPP, not tp Under CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK, handle_exception() reloads the kernel shadow call stack pointer (gp) only when the trap came from userspace. It made that decision with scs_load_current_if_task_changed, which compares the trap-time tp (read back from sscratch into s5) against the current tp: beq \prev, tp, _skip_scs scs_load_current _skip_scs: tp is a user-writable register. A user task that sets tp to the linear-map address of its own task_struct (¤t) before trapping makes the comparison succeed (can achieve by brute force with KASLR enable under our test), so the kernel skips scs_load_current and keeps running with the gp that userspace left in place. Under CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK gp is the shadow call stack pointer and load_global_pointer is a no-op, so the compiler-emitted "sd ra, -8(gp)" / "ld ra, -8(gp)" in every non-leaf function then write to, and return through, an attacker-controlled address -- an unprivileged kernel arbitrary-write and control-flow-hijack primitive. The poisoned gp is saved to task_struct.scs_sp on return, so the reload is skipped on every subsequent entry as well. Decide "came from userspace" from the hardware sstatus.SPP bit (already in s1 at this point) instead of from tp, mirroring the check that ret_from_exception already uses a few instructions later. SPP is written by hardware on trap entry and cannot be forged from U-mode. Legitimate behaviour is unchanged: user entries (SPP=0) reload the task shadow call stack, nested kernel entries (SPP=1) skip it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95719 | 2026-10-23 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| An arbitrary file deletion vulnerability exists in the command line interface of AOS-10 that could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to cause a denial of service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to crash the system, preventing it from rebooting without manual intervention and disrupting normal operation of the affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95717 | 2026-10-23 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of AOS that could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to inject malicious scripts. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of another authenticated user's browser session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95716 | 2026-10-23 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| An authentication bypass in the PAPI protocol of AOS-10 allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to change the state of certain settings of a vulnerable system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95715 | 2026-10-23 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated command injection vulnerability exists in the command line interface of AOS-10. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker with physical access to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95714 | 2026-10-23 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the API of AOS-10 that could allow an authenticated adjacent attacker with high privileges to achieve remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95713 | 2026-10-23 | 7 High | ||
| An unauthenticated buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the command line interface of AOS-8. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to disrupt the availability of the affected interface, along with limited access to or modification of some system data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95710 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-23 | 7.1 High |
| An unauthenticated buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of AOS-10 or AOS-8 and could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to conduct a denial of service attack. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to disrupt the availability of the affected system, with a limited impact to the integrity of the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95708 | 2026-10-23 | 7.2 High | ||
| Command injection vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-10 that could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to perform command injection. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79956 | 2026-10-23 | 7.2 High | ||
| A vulnerability in the CLI command handling of the AOS-8 web interface could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to run unauthorized commands on the system, potentially leading to system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79894 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-23 | 7.5 High |
| An unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the PAPI protocol of AOS-8. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to disrupt the availability of the affected interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79872 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-23 | 9.4 Critical |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of AOS that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by an unauthenticated remote attacker. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79865 | 2026-10-23 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| A memory corruption vulnerability in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to achieve remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79851 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-10 that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system, leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79850 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass existing authentication controls and run arbitrary commands on the underlying host. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79849 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against an affected AOS-8 instance. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79848 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against an affected AOS-8 instance. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79847 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets to the affected interface. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79844 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Authentication bypass vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98735 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-23 | 4.7 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_core: Serialize ACL scheduling with channel deletion hci_chan_sent() selects a channel under RCU but drops the read lock before accessing chan->conn and returning the channel. The ACL and LE schedulers then use its packet queue and update its transmit counters without any protection against channel deletion. After TX selects a channel and releases RCU, a disconnect command timeout on the separate request workqueue can run hci_conn_failed() and l2cap_conn_del(). hci_chan_del() can then unlink the channel, complete synchronize_rcu(), purge its queue and free it before TX resumes. This causes use-after-free both in hci_chan_sent() and in its callers. KASAN reported: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hci_chan_sent+0x892/0x9b0 Workqueue: hci0 hci_tx_work Call Trace: hci_chan_sent+0x892/0x9b0 hci_tx_work+0x5e6/0xb70 Allocated by task 91: hci_chan_create+0xe3/0x350 l2cap_conn_add.part.0+0x12/0xa30 l2cap_chan_connect+0x110d/0x1b60 l2cap_sock_connect+0x310/0x530 Freed by task 99: hci_chan_del+0x11f/0x170 l2cap_conn_del+0x4f1/0x800 l2cap_connect_cfm+0x88c/0xd30 hci_conn_failed+0x150/0x250 hci_abort_conn_sync+0x3e3/0x800 hci_cmd_sync_run+0x7e/0xc0 hci_abort_conn+0x105/0x1f0 disconnect_sync+0x157/0x290 hci_cmd_sync_work+0x13c/0x290 Hold the existing device mutex across channel selection and transmission in both schedulers to serialize them with channel teardown. Keep timeout handling outside the critical sections because hci_link_tx_to() acquires the same mutex. This also permits the transmit path to sleep, unlike extending the RCU read-side critical section across packet submission. | ||||