Export limit exceeded: 389759 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (389759 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-32283 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Crypto Tls, Go | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28780 | 1 Apache | 1 Http Server | 2026-09-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in mod_proxy_ajp of Apache HTTP Server. If mod_proxy_ajp connects to a malicious AJP server this AJP server can send a malicious AJP message back to mod_proxy_ajp and cause it to write 4 attacker controlled bytes after the end of a heap based buffer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: through 2.4.66. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.67, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1519 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| If a BIND resolver is performing DNSSEC validation and encounters a maliciously crafted zone, the resolver may consume excessive CPU. Authoritative-only servers are generally unaffected, although there are circumstances where authoritative servers may make recursive queries (see: https://kb.isc.org/docs/why-does-my-authoritative-server-make-recursive-queries). This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.46, 9.20.0 through 9.20.20, 9.21.0 through 9.21.19, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.46-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.20-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17038 | 1 Dreryk | 1 Dreryk Gabinet | 2026-09-10 | N/A |
| DrEryk Gabinet before 11.5.0 uses hard-coded API credentials in its ticket reporting component. These credentials can be used to authenticate directly to the ticket system API. This allows an attacker to perform privileged operations beyond what is offered by the application, including reading and modifying tickets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12143 | 2 Form-data, Redhat | 2 Form-data, Service Mesh | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| form-data is a library for creating readable multipart/form-data streams. In versions through 4.0.5, the `field` argument to `FormData#append` and the `filename` option are concatenated verbatim into the `Content-Disposition` header without escaping carriage return (CR), line feed (LF), or double-quote (") characters. An application that passes attacker-controlled data as a field name or filename (for example, an API gateway that turns JSON object keys into multipart field names) allows the attacker to terminate the header line and inject additional headers, or to smuggle entire additional multipart parts, into the request the application forwards to a backend. This can let the attacker add or override form fields (e.g. set `is_admin=true`) seen by the downstream parser. This is an instance of CWE-93 (CRLF injection). The fix escapes CR, LF, and `"` as `%0D`, `%0A`, and `%22` in field names and filenames, matching the serialization browsers use per the WHATWG HTML multipart/form-data encoding algorithm. Exploitation requires the consuming application to use untrusted input as a field name or filename; applications that use only fixed/trusted field names are not affected. Fixed in 2.5.6, 3.0.5, and 4.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0302 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Checkov By Prisma Cloud | 2026-09-10 | N/A |
| An OS command injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Checkov by Prisma® Cloud enables a local user to execute arbitrary commands in the processes running Checkov. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81994 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 5 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 2 more | 2026-09-10 | 8.2 High |
| Acrobat Reader is affected by an Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive files and directories outside the intended access scope. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54518 | 1 Amd | 11 Epyc 7002 Series Processors, Epyc Embedded 7002 Series Processors, Ryzen 3000 Series Desktop Processors and 8 more | 2026-09-10 | 7.0 High |
| Improper isolation of shared resources within the CPU operation cache on Zen 2-based products could allow an attacker to corrupt instructions executed at a different privilege level, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87486 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-10 | 4 Medium |
| Clickjacking in TrustedWebActivities in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a local attacker to spoof address bar via a co-installed app. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-87450 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect authorization in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to obtain sensitive information via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-69482 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 9 more | 2026-09-10 | 7.1 High |
| Creation of temporary file in directory with insecure permissions in Windows Error Reporting allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69907 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 9 more | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High |
| Improper handling of insufficient permissions or privileges in Windows Enterprise App Management allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72928 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows Server 2025, Windows Server 2025 (server Core Installation) | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| Use after free in Windows DNS allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75993 | 1 Adobe | 2 Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-10 | 8.5 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious scripts into a web page, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76190 | 1 Adobe | 2 Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-10 | 8.6 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81992 | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High | ||
| Acrobat Reader is affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80161 | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High | ||
| Acrobat Reader is affected by an Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81987 | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High | ||
| Acrobat Reader is affected by an Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88896 | 1 Espocrm | 1 Espocrm | 2026-09-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| EspoCRM before 10.0.4 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery. HostCheck::ipAddressIsNotInternal(), which validates outbound URLs to block requests to internal/private IP addresses, strips ::ffff: (IPv4-mapped IPv6) prefixes but does not recognize IPv6 transition addresses that embed private IPv4 addresses: NAT64 (64:ff9b::), 6to4 (2002::), and Teredo (2001:0000::). An attacker who controls a domain with AAAA records pointing to such transition addresses can bypass both the internal-host validation and the CURLOPT_RESOLVE IP-pinning check, causing EspoCRM to issue outbound requests to internal network services. Affected paths include POST /Attachment/fromImageUrl, reachable by any authenticated user with attachment access, and outbound webhook delivery, which requires an admin or API user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88895 | 1 Cyberpanel | 1 Cyberpanel | 2026-09-10 | 7.2 High |
| CyberPanel before 3.0.5 fails to enforce two-factor authentication on API endpoints, allowing attackers to bypass TOTP requirements using password-derived tokens. Attackers who obtain an administrator's password can derive API tokens and perform administrative operations or create authenticated sessions without the second factor. | ||||