Export limit exceeded: 410594 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 410594 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 410594 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 410594 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (410594 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-97844 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in DNS Server allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86879 | 1 Apple | 3 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os | 2026-10-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| A denial-of-service issue was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27. A remote attacker may be able to cause a denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84636 | 1 Apple | 6 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os and 3 more | 2026-10-20 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, watchOS 27. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84564 | 1 Apple | 7 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os and 4 more | 2026-10-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| An uninitialized memory issue was addressed with improved memory initialization. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, watchOS 27. Processing a maliciously crafted image may result in disclosure of process memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84538 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| A denial-of-service issue was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. A remote attacker may be able to cause a denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84506 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-20 | 7.8 High |
| A use after free issue was addressed with improved memory management. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination or corrupt kernel memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28930 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-20 | 7.5 High |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.5. An app may be able to access protected user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105298 | 2026-10-20 | N/A | ||
| Summary Before version 0.9.0, Pingora accepted HTTP/2 requests whose Host header differed from the :authority pseudo-header. Request filters, cache keys, and logs that read the request URI (session.req_header().uri) saw the :authority value, but the upstream received the client-supplied Host value. Pingora also accepted :authority values containing userinfo (for example, user@example.com). This violates RFC 9113 Section 8.3.1, which requires an intermediary to use the :authority value for Host and replace any existing Host field. Root cause * HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1: Host was generated from :authority only when the request had no Host header, so a conflicting client Host was forwarded unchanged. * HTTP/2 to HTTP/2: the client Host header was removed and used to overwrite the upstream :authority, after request filters had already run against the original :authority. * The HTTP/2 server did not compare Host with :authority and did not reject userinfo in the authority. Impact A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a single HTTP/2 request that the application sees as one host and the upstream receives as another. Where request filters, access controls, or cache keys use the URI authority and the upstream routes by Host, this can lead to: * Cache poisoning: a response from another virtual host is stored under the victim host's cache key and served to other users (this also requires the upstream to serve different content per Host). * Host-based access control bypass: a request approved for one host is served by a different virtual host on the upstream. Deployments that do not accept HTTP/2 from clients, or that do not use the request authority for security or caching decisions, are not affected. Note that Cloudflare CDN customers were unaffected, as internal Pingora services at Cloudflare do not have HTTP/2 clients. Mitigation: * Upgrade to pingora 0.9.0 or later. Pingora now returns 400 Bad Request for HTTP/2 requests whose Host differs from :authority, that contain more than one Host, or whose authority contains userinfo, and keeps the upstream Host or :authority consistent with the request authority. Fix commits: https://github.com/cloudflare/pingora/commit/915590a91811877795531f6ba0927a3138b5cb4b , https://github.com/cloudflare/pingora/commit/ffab8302d08d4292d1924eb8fe84647fd5cb8e76 * If you cannot upgrade: in request_filter, reject HTTP/2 requests that carry a Host header different from the URI authority, or whose authority contains '@'. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77938 | 1 Letta | 1 Letta | 2026-10-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| Letta through 0.16.8 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows users running tools to read server secrets because LocalSandbox subprocesses inherit the full server environment. Attackers can run code via POST /v1/tools/run or custom tools to read LETTA_PG_URI, POSTGRES_PASSWORD, and provider API keys, then access cross-tenant database data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77937 | 1 Letta | 1 Letta | 2026-10-20 | 8.1 High |
| Letta through 0.16.8 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows API callers to impersonate other users by supplying a self-asserted user_id HTTP header. Attackers can set user_id to another tenant's ID, even with LETTA_SERVER_SECURE enabled, to read and modify that user's agents, memory and configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77936 | 1 Letta | 1 Letta | 2026-10-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Letta through 0.16.8 ships a compose.yaml that does not enable LETTA_SERVER_SECURE, so the password middleware is never added and all API routes are unauthenticated, and it exposes a superuser PostgreSQL port with default credentials. Remote attackers can execute arbitrary Python via POST /v1/tools/run, manage /v1/admin users, or run OS commands via COPY PROGRAM. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77935 | 1 Coze | 1 Coze Studio | 2026-10-20 | 8.3 High |
| Coze Studio through 0.5.1 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in workflow.go that allows authenticated users to access other spaces' workflows by supplying foreign workflowIDs. Attackers can pair their own spaceID with another tenant's workflowID in save, update_meta, batch_delete, canvas, test_run and nodeDebug routes to read, run, overwrite or delete workflows. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77934 | 1 Coze | 1 Coze Studio | 2026-10-20 | 8.8 High |
| Coze Studio before 0.5.0 contains an insecure default configuration that allows any registered user to execute commands by running workflow code nodes in an unsandboxed python3 subprocess. Attackers can bypass the regex import filter with __import__('subprocess') to run commands, stealing environment variables, model API keys, and accessing MySQL, MinIO, Redis and etcd. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77933 | 1 Dbgpt | 1 Db-gpt | 2026-10-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| DB-GPT through 0.8.2 contains a hardcoded credentials vulnerability in its default docker-compose.yml that sets a static MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD and publishes port 3306 on all interfaces. Attackers reaching port 3306 or the shared dbgptnet network can authenticate as root@% to gain full database access including FILE and SUPER privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77930 | 2026-10-20 | 8.8 High | ||
| EvoScientist 0.1.0 before 0.2.5 contains an approval bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to run host shell commands by delegating them to async sub-agents lacking an interrupt_on gate. Attackers can plant instructions in ingested content such as fetched web pages, so the agent calls start_async_task and runs commands with user privileges and environment secrets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77926 | 2026-10-20 | 8.8 High | ||
| Aix-DB 1.2.4 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated non-admin users to run operating system commands through the ChatBI common agent's ungated deepagents execute tool. Attackers can send crafted chat input to POST /dify/get_answer or upload documents with malicious text to run host commands, exposing datasource credentials and model API keys. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75128 | 1 Chatchat-space | 1 Langchain-chatchat | 2026-10-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Langchain-Chatchat through 0.3.1.3 exposes a POST /tools/call API endpoint that invokes any registered tool by name without authentication, leaving the always-registered shell tool callable. Remote attackers can send a single request naming the shell tool to execute arbitrary OS commands as the server user (root in the shipped Docker image). | ||||
| CVE-2026-109444 | 2026-10-20 | 8.8 High | ||
| OpenSRE through 0.1.2026.10.19 contains an approval gate bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to execute shell_run commands without confirmation because the headless presenter's execution_allowed() always returns True. Attackers can inject instructions into alerts or Slack messages triaged by the agent to run commands on the host and exfiltrate LLM, Slack and cloud credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109443 | 2026-10-20 | 8.8 High | ||
| JoySafeter through 1.0.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated users to run operating system commands via an unsandboxed execute tool in Copilot standard mode. Attackers can self-register, select standard mode in the WebSocket chat.start extension, and have the agent invoke subprocess.run with shell=True on the host to access other tenants' data and server secrets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109442 | 2026-10-20 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| piflow 2.0.0 through 2.0.1 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in its DeepAgents chat agent, whose POST /chat and POST /chat/stream endpoints lack authentication. Attackers can instruct the agent to call the exec_shell tool, which runs arbitrary commands via subprocess.run without human approval or an allow-list, exposing environment secrets such as LLM API keys and database credentials. | ||||