| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Ghost versions from 3.20.2 before 6.51.0 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in image dimension refetching that allows authenticated staff users to trigger outbound HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs. Attackers can point image cards at attacker-controlled hosts or internal network endpoints to access metadata services and internal resources unavailable from the public internet. |
| Ghost versions 6.14.0 through versions prior to 6.27.0 contain a path traversal vulnerability in the ImageSize service. Insufficient input validation of user-supplied file paths may allow authenticated staff users to access local files outside the intended data storage directories on the server. |
| Ghost from 5.9.0 before 6.44.1 contains an input validation issue in the comments feature that allows authenticated members to access comments they are not authorized to view, resulting in disclosure of restricted comment data. |
| Ghost, an open-source publishing platform, contains an input validation flaw in its comment like feature in versions from 5.9.0 before 6.44.1. An authenticated member can delete comment likes or dislikes belonging to other users that they are not authorized to delete, resulting in an authorization bypass and unauthorized modification of comment engagement data. |
| Ghost versions 1.18.0 before 6.27.0 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the webhooks feature that allows staff users to probe internal hosts. Attackers with staff privileges can craft webhook requests to access internal network resources from the Ghost server. |
| Ghost versions from 2.21.0 before 6.56.0 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in the notifications system that allows low-privilege staff users to escalate to higher-privilege staff roles. Attackers with low-privilege staff access can exploit the notifications system to gain elevated privileges without proper authorization checks. |
| Ghost versions from 5.19.0 before 6.57.1 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the post feedback functionality that allows attackers to submit feedback on behalf of logged-in users. Attackers can craft a malicious link to the feedback page that automatically submits feedback when visited by authenticated members without their knowledge or consent. |
| Ghost versions from 5.125.1 before 6.57.1 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the Admin Feedback endpoint that allows unauthorized staff users to access member data. Attackers with staff privileges can query the feedback endpoint to retrieve sensitive member information without proper authorization checks. |
| Ghost versions 6.20.0 before 6.57.1 contain a session handling vulnerability that allows authenticated staff users to log in as any other staff user with only the password, bypassing two-factor authentication. Attackers with valid staff credentials can exploit improper session management to impersonate other staff members and gain unauthorized access to administrative functions. |
| Ghost versions 0.5.0 before 6.23.0 contain a concurrency issue in the staff invitation acceptance mechanism that allows multiple accounts to be created from a single invite token. Attackers can exploit this race condition by submitting concurrent requests with the same invitation token to create duplicate user accounts. |
| Ghost (npm package 'ghost') versions from 3.23.0 up to, but not including, 6.23.0 expose API keys to users with low-privilege staff accounts. An authenticated low-privilege staff user can read API keys returned by the Admin API, which are intended to be available only to higher-privileged users. |
| Ghost from version 0.8.0 before 6.23.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in its setup endpoint: the endpoint responds to unauthenticated requests with the site owner's email address, allowing any remote visitor to obtain it. |
| Ghost versions from 3.10.0 before 6.34.0 fail to fully invalidate all sessions after a password change. Attackers with a stolen session cookie can maintain access to user accounts even after the associated user changes their password. |
| Ghost versions 5.8.0 before 6.34.0 contain an input validation vulnerability in the admin iframe that allows attackers to take over staff user accounts. Attackers with content publishing privileges can craft malicious pages that, when visited by active staff users, enable account takeover through improper input validation. |
| Ghost versions from 2.5.0 before 6.34.0 contain an untrusted script execution vulnerability in the oEmbed preview feature that fails to sandbox externally hosted scripts. Attackers can craft malicious oEmbed content to execute scripts in the context of a staff user's admin session, potentially compromising administrative access. |
| Ghost versions before 6.20.0 contain a file extension filtering bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read theme templates and metadata. Attackers can use URL encoding to bypass extension validation and access sensitive theme files. |
| Ghost 5.42.2 before 6.58.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the Admin API bulk post and page edit and delete endpoints, which accept filters on restricted fields such as authors.password, because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-70590. Staff-level attackers can infer other staff users' password hashes from which filters match and perform offline password-guessing attacks against them. |
| Ghost versions 5.3.0 before 6.58.0 fail to properly enforce access controls on comments in private mode. Unauthenticated visitors can read comments that should be restricted, bypassing privacy settings. |
| Ghost versions 4.3.0 before 6.58.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where lower-privilege staff users can use staff tokens to bypass post editing restrictions. Attackers with staff credentials can leverage tokens to edit posts beyond their assigned privilege level. |
| Ghost versions from 2.10.0 before 6.63.0 contain a staff enumeration vulnerability in the content API that allows unauthenticated attackers to leak user data. Attackers can observe discrepancies in API metadata responses to enumerate staff members and extract sensitive information without authentication. |
