| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Rodauth before 2.47.0 contains a cross-site request forgery protection bypass vulnerability in the JSON request content type validation. Attackers can craft cross-origin form posts with content types containing application/json substrings to bypass CSRF token validation and force victims to authenticate to attacker-controlled accounts. |
| The Newsletters WordPress plugin before 4.17 does not perform any nonce or capability check when saving one of its settings screens, and writes every submitted parameter into its own options, allowing attackers to make a logged in administrator overwrite arbitrary Newsletters WordPress plugin before 4.17 settings, including the credential protecting its API, via a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack. |
| Nagios Core before 4.5.13 and Nagios XI before 2026R1.5 contains a CSRF vulnerability in cmd.cgi. When no Cookie header is present, the double-submit cookie protection can be bypassed by supplying matching NagFormId and nagFormId values in the POST body, allowing a cross-site request to execute Nagios commands as a currently authenticated user. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery weaknesses in the Administrative Console of PingFederate versions before version 13.1 may allow actors to perform unauthorized actions via specially-crafted links triggered by administrators with active sessions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Lime Technology, Inc.'s Unraid OS version 6.12.14 and earlier allows remote attackers to escalate privileges via the Unraid authentication cookie's lax same-site policy. |
| WatchGuard Dimension's Web UI exposes an administrator passphrase change action that lacks CSRF protection. An attacker who can induce an authenticated global administrator's browser to visit a crafted link or page can change that administrator's passphrase to an attacker-chosen value without the administrator's consent. |
| WWBN AVideo through 30.0 (and master up to commit 4cb576e) contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/myLiveControls.save.json.php. The endpoint only checks that a user is logged in and processes customUrl, customMessage, and autoRedirect parameters from $_REQUEST via a GET request without enforcing a CSRF token or origin check. An attacker who lures a logged-in streamer to a malicious page can silently change the live-channel viewer-redirect settings (persisted in users.externalOptions), causing viewers to be redirected to a phishing site or shown a spoofed message. |
| In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the Exchange Web Services (EWS) endpoint of Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) due to insufficient validation of request content types. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by causing an authenticated user to submit a crafted request, potentially allowing unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of the victim. |
| FrontAccounting through 2.4.20 generates a CSRF token in end_form() in includes/ui/ui_controls.inc and embeds it as the _token hidden field in every form it renders, but only admin/users.php and admin/change_current_user_password.php call check_csrf_token() to validate it. No financial transaction handler validates the token, including gl/gl_journal.php, gl/gl_bank.php, purchasing/supplier_invoice.php, sales/customer_invoice.php, sales/customer_payments.php and admin/company_preferences.php, so those endpoints act on POST data with no origin check. An attacker who gets an authenticated user to load a page under attacker control can auto-submit a cross-origin form to any of them and have the forged journal entry, invoice, customer payment, bank transaction or company configuration change recorded under the victim's session. |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who holds the "power" Splunk role could store a Dashboard Studio workflow action containing attacker-controlled Search Processing Language (SPL). When another authenticated user selects the action from Event Actions and selects Continue, Splunk Enterprise runs the injected SPL using the permissions of that user. The injected SPL could access or modify data available to that user. The vulnerability is possible because Dashboard Studio does not sufficiently validate workflow-action URLs before submitting requests. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The user who holds the "power" Splunk role should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in FluentBooking Pro <= 2.2.4 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GeoDirectory <= 2.8.176 versions. |
| The UpdraftPlus: WP Backup & Migration Plugin WordPress plugin before 1.26.7 does not have CSRF checks in one of its backup management actions, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin restore an existing backup, reverting the site's database and files to an earlier state, via a crafted link. |
| AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in channelToGallery.json.php that allows attackers to modify site-wide Gallery configuration by performing unauthorized writes to plugin data. Attackers can craft a cross-site GET request carrying an administrator's session cookie to promote arbitrary channels to the front page or delete curated sections without token validation. |
| Nagios Core before 4.5.12 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in cmd.cgi where the CSRF protection mechanism passes validation when the NagFormId cookie is absent. Attackers can craft a malicious cross-site POST request to execute arbitrary Nagios commands as a currently authenticated user without their knowledge or consent. |
| WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in objects/videoEditLight.php that lacks request authenticity checks and accepts GET requests. Attackers can store an img tag in a video description that transfers video ownership to an attacker-controlled account when an administrator views the video page. |
| IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, and FW950.00 through FW950.H2 is affected by a vulnerability in the ASMI web interface. An attacker who can lure a logged-in ASMI administrator to visit a crafted web page can, under specific conditions, silently perform administrative actions on the FSP on behalf of that administrator, resulting in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system. |
| PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to praisonai 4.6.58, MCP HTTP Stream _validate_origin uses request_origin.startswith(allowed), allowing the attacker-controlled localhost.attacker.com HTTP origin to satisfy the localhost allowlist. A webpage can send Content-Type: text/plain requests without preflight and invoke tools/call without an API key, including file writes that persist agent instructions. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.58. |
| Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to 15.114.0 and 16.26.0, the approve and authorize functions in frappe/integrations/oauth2.py allow the OAuth2 consent flow to proceed without restricting approve to POST, without a csrf_token in frappe/templates/includes/oauth_confirmation.html, and without scoping an active OAuth token check to the requesting client. An attacker can cause an authenticated user to approve an OAuth grant or reuse authorization state for the wrong client, exposing data and permitting actions within the granted scopes. This issue is fixed in versions 15.114.0 and 16.26.0. |
| Tina is a headless content management system. Prior to 2.5.2, the TinaCMS CLI package's Vite dev server packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/vite/cors.ts origin callback returns false for a disallowed origin but does not reject the request, and packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/vite/plugins.ts still routes POST /media/upload/* to mediaRouter.handlePost. The upload code in packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/commands/dev-command/server/media.ts writes attacker-controlled multipart contents inside the configured media root. A remote attacker can cause a developer's browser to submit this state-changing request by inducing the developer to visit an attacker-controlled page while tinacms dev is running. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.2. |
