Search Results (10784 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-2617 1 Hitachienergy 1 Rtu500 Firmware 2026-04-15 7.2 High
A vulnerability exists in the RTU500 that allows for authenticated and authorized users to bypass secure update, if secure update feature was not enabled on all CMUs of a RTU500. If a malicious actor successfully exploits this vulnerability, they could use it to update the RTU500 with unsigned firmware.
CVE-2023-50923 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almost infinite number of ways in which data can be hidden or embed whithin seemingly normal network traffic."
CVE-2024-4204 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
The Bulk Posts Editing For WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin's AJAX actions.. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create and duplicate posts, retrieve post content, and modify post taxonomy among other things via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-64700 1 Growi 1 Growi 2026-04-15 N/A
Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in GROWI v7.3.3 and earlier. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, the user may be tricked to do unintended operations.
CVE-2024-42476 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
In the OAuth library for nim prior to version 0.11, the Authorization Code grant and Implicit grant both rely on the `state` parameter to prevent cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks where a resource owner might have their session associated with protected resources belonging to an attacker. When this project is compiled with certain compiler flags set, it is possible that the `state` parameter will not be checked at all, creating a CSRF vulnerability. Version 0.11 checks the `state` parameter using a regular `if` statement or `doAssert` instead of relying on a plain `assert`. `doAssert` will achieve the desired behavior even if `-d:danger` or `--assertions:off` is set.
CVE-2025-66600 1 Yokogawa 1 Fast/tools 2026-04-15 N/A
A vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. This product lacks HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) configuration. When an attacker performs a Man in the middle (MITM) attack, communications with the web server could be sniffed. The affected products and versions are as follows: FAST/TOOLS (Packages: RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) R9.01 to R10.04
CVE-2024-12554 2026-04-15 5.4 Medium
The Peter’s Custom Anti-Spam plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the cas_register_post() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to blacklist emails via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2023-52212 2 Automattic, Wordpress 2 Wp Job Manager, Wordpress 2026-04-15 5.4 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Automattic WP Job Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Job Manager: from n/a through 2.0.0.
CVE-2025-13008 2 M-files, M-files Corporation 3 M-files Server, Server, M-files Server 2026-04-15 N/A
An information disclosure vulnerability in M-Files Server before versions 25.12.15491.7, 25.8 LTS SR3, 25.2 LTS SR3 and 24.8 LTS SR5 allows an authenticated attacker using M-Files Web to capture session tokens of other active users.
CVE-2025-61430 1 Simpledns 1 Simple Dns Plus 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
Improper handling of DNS over TCP in Simple DNS Plus v9 allows a remote attacker with querying access to the DNS server to cause the server to return request payloads from other clients. This happens when the TCP length prefix is malformed (len differs from actual packet len), and due to a concurrency/buffering issue, even when the lengths match. A length prefix that is smaller than the actual packet size increases information leakage. In summary, this vulnerability allows an attacker to see DNS queries of other clients.
CVE-2024-11342 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 6.1 Medium
The Skt NURCaptcha plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the skt-nurc-admin.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2024-31264 2 Dfactory, Wordpress 2 Post Views Counter, Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Post Views Counter <= 1.4.4 versions.
CVE-2025-27579 2026-04-15 5.4 Medium
In Bitaxe ESP-Miner before 2.5.0 with AxeOS, one can use an /api/system CSRF attack to update the payout address (aka stratumUser) for a Bitaxe Bitcoin miner, or change the frequency and voltage settings.
CVE-2023-52235 1 Spacex Starlink Wi Fi Router Gen 2 1 Spacex Starlink Wi Fi Router Gen 2 2026-04-15 8.8 High
SpaceX Starlink Wi-Fi router GEN 2 before 2023.53.0 and Starlink Dish before 07dd2798-ff15-4722-a9ee-de28928aed34 allow CSRF (e.g., for a reboot) via a DNS Rebinding attack.
CVE-2021-47820 1 Ubeeinteractive 1 Ubee Evw327 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Ubee EVW327 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to enable remote access without user interaction. Attackers can craft a malicious webpage that automatically submits a form to change router remote access settings to port 8080 without the user's consent.
CVE-2024-4344 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
The Shield Security – Smart Bot Blocking & Intrusion Prevention Security plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 19.1.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the exec function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disable pin protection for the admin interface of the plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2020-37046 1 Adikiss 1 Sistem Informasi Pengumuman Kelulusan Online 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Sistem Informasi Pengumuman Kelulusan Online 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to add unauthorized admin users through the tambahuser.php endpoint. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML form to submit admin credentials and create new administrative accounts without the victim's consent.
CVE-2021-47722 1 Zucchetti 1 Axess Cloki Access Control 2026-04-15 3.5 Low
Zucchetti Axess CLOKI Access Control 1.64 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate access control settings without user interaction. Attackers can craft malicious web pages with hidden forms to disable or modify access control parameters by tricking authenticated users into loading the page.
CVE-2024-38724 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 7.1 High
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Muhammad Rehman Contact Form 7 Summary and Print allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Contact Form 7 Summary and Print: from n/a through 1.2.5.
CVE-2024-22475 2026-04-15 6.1 Medium
Cross-site request forgery vulnerability in multiple printers and scanners which implement Web Based Management provided by BROTHER INDUSTRIES, LTD. allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform unintended operations on the affected product. As for the details of affected product names, model numbers, and versions, refer to the information provided by the respective vendors listed under [References].