| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Craft is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 4.17.3 and 5.9.7, Craft CMS has a CSRF issue in the preview token endpoint at /actions/preview/create-token. The endpoint accepts an attacker-supplied previewToken. Because the action does not require POST and does not enforce a CSRF token, an attacker can force a logged-in victim editor to mint a preview token chosen by the attacker. That token can then be used by the attacker (without authentication) to access previewed/unpublished content tied to the victim’s authorized preview scope. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.17.3 and 5.9.7. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Tour allows Cross Site Request Forgery.
This issue affects Grand Tour: from n/a through 5.5.1. |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of AOS-CX switches exposes some sessions to a lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection. This could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary input against the affected interface if the attacker can convince an authenticated user of the interface to interact with a specially crafted URL. |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.2 before 18.11.11, 19.0 before 19.0.8, 19.1 before 19.1.6, and 19.2 before 19.2.4 that under certain conditions could have allowed an unauthenticated user to execute mutations via GET requests due to improper request validation in GraphQL multiplex query handling. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Mang Board WP <= 2.3.8 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Simply Schedule Appointments <= 1.6.12.23 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Activity Log <= 2.13.1 versions. |
| The JetStyleManager for Gutenberg WordPress plugin before 1.3.9 does not have CSRF protection on some of its AJAX actions, allowing attackers to make a logged-in user with the edit_posts capability (Contributor and above) delete or modify custom widget skins via a crafted request, provided they can trick the user into performing an action such as clicking a link. |
| The WC Vendors WordPress plugin before 2.7.2.1 does not have CSRF protection on some of its front-end order shipment status actions, which could allow attackers to make a logged-in vendor change the shipment status of their own orders via a crafted request. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows Cross Site Request Forgery.
This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V.4 before V.16. |
| ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener protects a Wicket application against cross-site request forgery by rejecting requests that a resource isolation policy judges to come from another origin. Its default policy, FetchMetadataResourceIsolationPolicy, was derived from a reference implementation written to guard static resources, and it inherited two allowances that are unsafe when the thing being guarded is an action on a page:
* Every "simple top-level navigation" was allowed. Any GET request carrying Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate whose Sec-Fetch-Dest was neither object nor embed was allowed, whatever Sec-Fetch-Site said — including cross-site. Wicket invokes component listeners (Link.onClick(), form submits, behaviour callbacks) through ordinary GET navigations, so a page under an attacker's control could navigate the victim's browser to a listener URL and have that listener run inside the victim's authenticated session. Browsers send SameSite=Lax cookies — the effective default when no SameSite attribute is set — on cross-site top-level GET navigations, so the victim's session cookie accompanied the request.
* Sec-Fetch-Site: same-site was allowed unconditionally. That value means the same registrable domain and scheme but a different origin — another subdomain or another port. Any sibling origin could therefore invoke any listener by any method, POST form submits included, and cookies are always sent on same-site requests regardless of SameSite. A hostile sibling origin obtained through a subdomain takeover, through delegated user content, or through an XSS elsewhere on the site could act as the authenticated user.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue.
Affected versions
* Apache Wicket 9.1.0 through 9.23.0
* Apache Wicket 10.0.0 through 10.10.0
Not affected
Any release older than 9.1.0:
* Apache Wicket 8.x (8.0.0 through 8.17.0). The resource isolation classes do not exist in the 8.x line, which offers only the Origin/Referer-based CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener. No 8.x release requires a fix.
* Apache Wicket 9.0.0. ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener and FetchMetadataResourceIsolationPolicy were introduced by WICKET-6786 and first shipped in 9.1.0 (released 2020-10-07). |
| AVideo contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/API/set.json.php that allows attackers to perform state-changing actions by crafting GET requests that bypass CSRF protection. Attackers can navigate a victim's browser to a malicious URL with API parameters to delete videos, deactivate accounts, or modify playlists without user interaction. |
| @hono/oauth-providers is Authentication middleware for Hono. Prior to version 0.8.6, the built-in social login providers accept an OAuth callback even when the `state` value is absent on both sides, so the anti-CSRF check passes for a callback that never came from a genuine login attempt. This defeats the `state`-based CSRF protection under default usage. Version 0.8.6 has a patch. |
| Wallos is an open-source, self-hostable personal subscription tracker. Prior to version 4.9.4, login.php generates an OIDC state nonce stored in $_SESSION['oidc_state'], but checksession.php dispatches the OIDC callback without comparing the incoming state against the session value. An attacker can trick a victim into visiting a crafted URL, causing Wallos to exchange the attacker's authorization code and log the victim into the attacker's account. This issue has been patched in version 4.9.4. |
| elFinder is an open-source file manager for web, written in JavaScript using jQuery UI. Prior to 2.1.70, the netmount command is omitted from elFinderConnector::$csrfProtectedCmds in php/elFinderConnector.class.php, so validateCsrfToken() is not called for this state-changing operation. In the shipped php/connector.minimal.php-dist configuration, FTP network mounts are enabled by default, and attacker-controlled protocol, host, path, port, user, pass, alias, and options arguments flow through elFinder::netmount() in php/elFinder.class.php to php/elFinderVolumeFTP.class.php. A cross-site request can therefore persist an attacker-chosen FTP mount in the victim's session, cause the PHP server to connect to an attacker-chosen FTP host and port, and send supplied credentials without an X-elFinder-CSRF token. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.70. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Matt Martz & Andy Stratton Page Restrict.This issue affects Page Restrict: from n/a through 2.5.5. |
| A flaw has been found in wger-project wger up to 2.6.0-alpha2. This issue affects the function reset_user_password of the file wger/gym/views/gym.py of the component Password Reset. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. This patch is called 3c6ce4b7f3eeafeb35318c6c4e82b1a3fd28b314. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue. |
| WWBN AVideo contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in sendEmail.json.php that allows authenticated administrators to send mail from the site's contact address by bypassing origin checks and captcha validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that, when visited by an authenticated admin, sends emails with attacker-controlled subject and body to arbitrary recipients, passing SPF/DKIM/DMARC validation for phishing and brand impersonation attacks. |
| The Ebyte device does not adequately verify the origin or authenticity of
requests submitted to the web management interface. An unauthenticated
remote attacker could persuade an authenticated administrator to visit a
crafted page, causing unauthorized configuration changes or a
disruption of device availability. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
