| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Simple Membership plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'country' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.8.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Unauthenticated attackers may also exploit this vulnerability when the plugin's Enable Free Membership feature is turned on, as it permits anonymous front-end registration and profile submission. |
| A security flaw has been discovered in DeepPavlov up to 1.7.0. Impacted is the function resolve of the file deeppavlov/core/common/params.py of the component Config Reference Resolver. The manipulation results in code injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. |
| The Coinbase Commerce Payment Gateway for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 1.4.1 does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment webhook notifications, because the shared secret used to validate the request signature is empty by default and nothing rejects an unconfigured secret, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge notifications that mark arbitrary orders as paid or cancel already-paid orders. |
| The Snap Finance WordPress plugin before 3.12.0 does not verify that a request to change a WooCommerce order's status comes from an authorised source, allowing unauthenticated attackers to move any order into a paid state or force it to fail. |
| The JetFormBuilder — Dynamic Blocks Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting via the '<attacker-chosen query var name matching the preset's query_var setting>' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This is only exploitable on pages embedding a form that has a text field configured with a query_var Dynamic Preset and a data-jfb-macro or JFB_FIELD:: macro reference targeting that field, both of which are standard, documented plugin features. |
| MISP contains a data integrity flaw in its event deletion logic. When a user deletes an event, several associated records are not removed from the database, leaving them as orphaned entries. The affected record types include event report tags, event graph entries, proposal (shadow attribute) correlations, fuzzy ssdeep correlation chunks, and attachment scan results.
These orphaned records may contain sensitive threat intelligence data such as correlation mappings, scan results, and report metadata that should have been removed along with the parent event. Their persistence beyond the intended deletion lifecycle creates a risk of unintended data retention and potential information exposure if the records are reachable through other application queries or administrative interfaces.
Preconditions:
- An authenticated user with sufficient privileges to delete events in MISP.
- The event must have associated reports, graphs, correlations, ssdeep chunks, or attachment scan results.
Impact:
- Residual sensitive data persists in the database after the parent event is deleted.
- Accumulation of orphaned records over time may contribute to storage bloat.
- Orphaned records may be inadvertently exposed through other data-access paths that do not validate the existence of the parent event.
Affected versions: <2.5.48 |
| In MISP, the event synchronization process contained a logic error in the preparation of event reports for remote push. The filtering of non-exportable tags was applied only once after the iteration over all reports, rather than to each individual report.
As a result:
- All reports except the last one in the set were pushed to the remote MISP instance with their non-exportable tags intact, effectively disclosing restricted tag information to the receiving instance.
- When the last report in the set was withheld (empty), a null report was pushed, causing the remote instance to fail saving the event.
This issue affects any MISP instance configured to push events with multiple reports to a remote server via synchronization.
Affected: <2.5.48. |
| MISP contains an access control flaw in the proposal (shadow attribute) visibility logic. The authorization check accepted any attribute or object carrying one of the user's sharing groups without verifying the distribution level, and denied the owning organisation access to proposals on its own organisation-only attributes.
- A user belonging to a sharing group could view proposals on attributes or objects with that sharing group, regardless of the attribute's distribution level (levels 1-3 should restrict visibility)
- The owning organisation could not view proposals on its own org-only attributes
Security impact: Unauthorized disclosure of proposed attribute changes to users who should not have access based on distribution level restrictions.
Affected: <2.5.48 |
| A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Inventory System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/transactions_handler.php?action=save_sale of the component Sales Management Handler. The manipulation of the argument Hsn_Code results in cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. |
| The Appointment Booking Plugin – LatePoint | Calendar & Scheduling for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference / Missing Authorization in versions up to, and including, 5.7.2. This is due to the publicly reachable steps__start and steps__load_step routes accepting a params[presets][order_item_id] value that is copied verbatim into the booking object without verifying that the referenced order item belongs to the current customer, is a bundle item, is paid, or has remaining capacity — the is_bundle_scheduling() bundle discriminator is a mere !empty(order_item_id) truthiness check, and the code flow explicitly removes the customer and payment steps when this is truthy (the source even carries a TODO acknowledging the missing validation). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create approved appointments against other customers' order items and to read those customers' names, email addresses, and order codes returned in the booking confirmation. |
| SQL injection (SQLi) vulnerability—specifically a UNION-based vulnerability—in the Integratec application that affects the sInfo parameter sent via POST to the endpoint /login/ap_Login.aspx/start. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to steal data from the database, such as credentials and user information, and cause errors and partial denial-of-service conditions. Furthermore, this vulnerability could facilitate other types of follow-up attacks, such as data exfiltration or privilege escalation. |
| An Improper Privilege Management vulnerability [CWE-269] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.6.0, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions may allow an authenticated administrator to bypass the trusted host policy via crafted CLI command. |
| VOCALOID6 Editor provided by Yamaha Corporation improperly restricts XML external entity references. Loading a specially crafted project file may the product to initiate unintended communication, potentially leading to the leak of sensitive information from the device where the product is installed or resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. |
| A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Inventory System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /api/transactions_handler.php?action=save_purchase of the component Purchase Records Handler. The manipulation of the argument Product_Name/Product_Code/Vendor_Name leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| The Snap Finance WordPress plugin through 3.11.0 does not verify that the payment provider's response actually confirms a completed, approved transaction before marking a WooCommerce order as paid, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary orders as paid without completing payment. |
| The BDM Digital Payment Gateway WordPress plugin through 1.3.12 does not verify the credentials on its public payment-status update route and treats unset credentials as valid, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary WooCommerce orders as paid without payment in the default configuration. |
| The Salon Booking System WordPress plugin before 10.31.11 does not enforce a minimum of zero when subtracting a fixed-amount discount from a booking's total, allowing an unauthenticated visitor who knows a valid discount code to create a confirmed booking stored with a negative total. |
| The Document Gallery WordPress plugin through 5.1.1 does not sanitise or escape several gallery shortcode attributes before embedding them in a single-quoted HTML attribute in the rendered gallery markup, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to inject arbitrary event handlers that execute when a higher privileged user views the content. |
| The Document Gallery WordPress plugin through 5.1.1 does not verify the signature on one of its unauthenticated webhook endpoints when no shared secret has been configured, which is the default state, allowing unauthenticated users to replace the thumbnail image the site publishes for any document. |
| The Subscribe to Comments WordPress plugin before 2.3.3 does not sanitise newline characters from a notification sender-name setting before using it in e-mail headers, allowing users with Author-level access and above to inject arbitrary e-mail headers, such as a hidden Bcc, and to spoof the sender. |
